Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PTron

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No prejudice against a redirect to the parent company. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:00, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PTron

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, sources cited are distinctly sub-par. Kleuske (talk) 12:41, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I removed the bad sources, and I don't see anything else wrong with the article. EMachine03 (talk) 13:54, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 18:55, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 18:55, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:15, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non notable corp. - Mar11 (talk) 18:12, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep- References found on the web passes it GNG. The current version of the article seems okay. - Mar11 (talk) 18:15, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't see quality references, some press releases and their reprints. WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES spam. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:05, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:23, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- fails WP:CORPDEPTH; Wikipedia is not a directory of nn brands. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:36, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Palred Technologies of which this is a brand. The superficial coverage is in the context of this corporation's business results. Sandstein 13:32, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.