Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overseas Christian Fellowship

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 17:47, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Overseas Christian Fellowship

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

similar article was recently deleted for the same organisation Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overseas Christian Fellowship Australia. LibStar (talk) 03:08, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Organisation is notable, with several gbooks hits. The existence of this article was a factor in the previous AfD. -- 202.124.88.183 (talk) 11:28, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

— 202.124.88.183 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Delete This is not a notable organization. Google Books hits consist of one passing mention, otherwise only directories. A search of Google News Archive finds nothing significant. --MelanieN (talk) 00:14, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. —Paul foord (talk) 08:52, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Paul foord (talk) 08:52, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Google Books turns up one 45 page book for me, with no preview it sounds more like an advertising pamphlet. Regardless, one little book + fleeting mentions in a couple of other books do not constitute "significant coverage". Just like the other AfD, this blatantly fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG. bou·le·var·dier (talk) 15:49, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
DeletePer aboveFive Years 11:30, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.