Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outwar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 12:16, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Outwar

Outwar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Totally, completely original research. Subject is most likely non-notable, as the article currently gives no evidence that its subject meets the Web content criteria. --Slowking Man 09:47, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - The subject is notable due to the fact that many groups do not like seeing spam from Outwar (Look at http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Outwar+spam&btnG=Google+Search ). Instead of deleting the article, we could start from scratch. Outwar has an Alexa rank of 31,286 - http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?q=outwar.com&url=http://fabar.outwar.com/outwar_tos.html - WhisperToMe 15:38, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep More sophisticated schemes for misdirecting internet traffic have been developed first, but based upon the immense amount of material in blogs and the numerous blogs devoted to the game itself, its notable.This is one of the cases where such sources are acceptable. DGG 09:30, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.