Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OISE Language Coaching

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:15, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OISE Language Coaching

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find any reliable sources discussing this organisation. Sam Walton (talk) 11:33, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Jim Carter ⁽^talk⁾ 13:26, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:26, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:30, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This article has been edited substantially by several WP:SPA users with the firm name in their usernames: User:Oisesarah, User:Stellaoise, User:Lctoise, the last of whom has identified in a comment that they work for the company. AllyD (talk) 07:50, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete: The article prose is promotional, though that could be resolved by normal editing. I added the one reference that I could find in multiple searches (Highbeam, Questia) though it is just routine coverage noting recent activity (acquisition, AIM listing). A lot hinges on the two press pieces: 2012 Le Point interview with the firm's founder; section in 2006 Management Today article on the sector. The latter does describe the firm as "the largest chain of language schools in the UK"; the question is whether such a point-in-time claim is of lasting encyclopaedic notability? I am borderline on this, but I think more is expected for WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 08:48, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.