Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nusrit Shaheen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 22:00, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nusrit Shaheen

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'll be nominating this article for deletion. As above, a speedy deletion is not warranted, but the subject of the article is currently notable only for being the longest survivor of her condition, and as a result she is already mentioned on the page for that condition. I don't think a standalone article is justified; nor do I think it can be improved. --86.53.18.62 (talk) 12:42, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Completing nomination on behalf of IP editor. Above text is copied from article talk page. I have no opinion of my own at this time. --Finngall ^talk 15:43, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:55, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:55, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:55, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:55, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:55, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:55, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom who appears to be invoking WP:SINGLEEVENT. Ifnord (talk) 15:58, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete surviving a long time with a disease is not a default sign of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:22, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, to reiterate, I think she is a notable individual. Just not enough for a standalone article. 86.53.18.62 (talk) 12:48, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SIGCOV. While I admire anyone with her kind of spirit, we are not a directory nor a web-host for every such person. Perhaps the OP/nominator intended a redirect as a solution? Bearian (talk) 17:23, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, I think a conversion to redirect would be appropriate. 86.53.18.62 (talk) 12:41, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.