Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Kanpur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 17:39, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

North Kanpur

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the first criterion of WP: GEOLAND, that is to say it has no mention on the websites of Registrar General and Census Commissioner, Government of India and Government of Uttar Pradesh, so in all probability isn't a legally recognized place.

Plus, the article is unreferenced, contains an enormous amount of Original Research, the content is largely false, as both sides of Kanpur come under Kanpur Municipal Corporation, Kanpur Nagar district and Kanpur division.

Also, thanks to DreamLinker for letting me know about the article(s).
Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 19:07, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 03:54, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 03:54, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have an article about East London despite the fact it is not an official area and all of East London is included in London. Also "North Kanpur" shows many people using the term on lots of different websites. However I don't know if this helps or if any of your policies say it should be kept. There is also East Kanpur which has been nominated for deletion and there was West Kanpur which was deleted and even a South Kanpur which has not been nominated for deletion. Ilyina Olya Yakovna (talk) 15:09, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:47, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- Per WP:GEOLAND. Not an assembly constituency and even major metropolises in India have not been split this way unless they are suburban areas. The lack of sources makes it even more dubious as to whether such a designated area exists. MT Train^Discuss 13:23, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The discussions Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Kanpur - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Kanpur - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Kanpur - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Kanpur are related. Ilyina Olya Yakovna (talk) 14:57, 19 January 2018 (UTC) [reply]

Delete Per WP:GEOLAND Should be combined with deletion of all similar pages as listed above Hagennos (talk) 05:25, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.