Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nippon Kaigi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:13, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nippon Kaigi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested A7 speedy. Fairly well cited although cites are mostly print/not readily available. Tawker (talk) 21:32, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I don't really understand - there are links to most of the sources listed in the article and even if there weren't, sources need not be online. Some of the sources listed focus on the subject - whole academic papers worth of coverage. I'm not sure how this could be considered non-notable. What am I missing? Stalwart111 22:32, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Anyone who wants to know what the Nippon Kaigi is – here is the information, short to the point and with references. No idea why someone wanted it to be deleted – maybe the one does not like it mentioned per se – who knows.--Catflap08 (talk) 06:50, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The scope of Nippon Kaigi' s activities is national in scale. The neo-nationalistic positions and the influence of Nippon Kaigo on the Japanese Government have attracted widespread attention. It has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable, secondary sources, that are independent of this organization. These are cited in the article, including reputable Japanese and international Newspapers (New York Times, Asahi Shinbun), peer reviewed Academic Journals, and books from well-known publishers. The sources allow to expand the article in the future. I think the article reflects the cited sources in a neutral way, I don't see any POV pushing. JimRenge (talk) 13:50, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:19, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:19, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:19, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Notable. I've linked it to other languages, there are more sources (in the Japanese article). --Moscow Connection (talk) 02:43, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.