Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nintendo Independent Wiki Alliance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 09:52, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nintendo Independent Wiki Alliance

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not meet the WP:Notability guidelines for reliable third-party sources. Poopmai (talk) 05:04, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Two-year-old umbrella organization for web fan sites. No evidence of notability provided in the article, and I find no independent WP:RS coverage at all. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 06:08, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no evidence that the subject is notable per WP:GNG. --Kinu ^t/_c 07:37, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:43, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:43, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Lack of coverage in reliable, third party sources. (If we don't find things like "Super Mario Wiki" as notable enough for an article, not sure how we could possibly find an unofficial grouping of this and similar wiki's notable either.) Sergecross73 msg me 15:42, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.