Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nina Aquila: Legal Eagle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:13, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nina Aquila: Legal Eagle

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable video game, failing WP:GNG - Google search comes up nothing but a Indie Games Plus entry, which is a "Trailer Tuesday" list of various games; obviously does not fulfill the "significant mention" criteria. No luck with the WP:VG/S search engine also, returns only 7 results, all pointing to one Russian site (ag.ru) that lists video games. Doesn't really help to begin with that the only "source" listed in the article is an itch.io "devlog" by the developer themselves. theinstantmatrix (talk) 16:44, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. theinstantmatrix (talk) 16:44, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with nom. Non notable game. Donaldd23 (talk) 18:37, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 15:12, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails GNG. Woodroar (talk) 20:59, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.