Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nijanand

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The keep arguments do not quite address the various delete concerns (WP:PROMO, WP:OR, questionable WP:Notability) Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:57, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nijanand

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Content is not written as an encyclopedia article. Appears to be solely for the purpose of promoting the belief system; would need a complete rewrite. Completely unreferenced, the only link is to the website of the organization. Zoodino (talk) 04:22, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Zoodino (talk) 04:22, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Zoodino (talk) 04:22, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Zoodino (talk) 04:22, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article is good and has 7 references in addition to website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.184.4.230 (talk) 15:29, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article has helped me explore more about Nijanand sampradaya only after this article I have Watched Shree Prannathji TV series on youtube which portrays the life of Lord Prannathji. Now I am Eagerly waiting for Chhatrasal web series. Also there are the holy books Available on Nijanand.org and that is also good for reference books. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 43.249.230.116 (talk) 16:01, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article has helped me explore more about Nijanand sampradaya only after this article I have Watched Shree Prannathji TV series on youtube which portrays the life of Lord Prannathji. Now I am Eagerly waiting for Chhatrasal web series. Also there are the holy books Available on Nijanand.org and that is also good for reference books.

This one of best teaching info to understand world religious and unity of the world. All the information and teaching in this article help understand unified messages of the Gita, Bhagvat, Veds, Puran, Bible , Koorna and other worlds scripture. What i have gain from this article was life time teaching such as Nijanand mean your Anand and how we should all live our life to help this world to be more peaceful and prosperous from Human being and equality.

I am not sure why this most useful article in context to current world situation being candidate of the deletion. This will be biggest mistake and should be reconsider to keep it. This info are very useful and it to content of life guidance. We shouldn't delete from this important wiki online resources just based on some assumption and then re-grate later as we going to loose important info of user like me and several other. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.184.4.230 (talk) 20:40, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the article is written for promoting the belief system and is way detailed and in WP:PROMO style for an encyclopedia article. Also to note is the this article has twice been deleted Deletion Log, via CSD and PROD. Even if it barely makes it through WP:GNG criteria (highly doubtful), the current version and all its history satisfies WP:TNT. Also to worry about is this number of single purpose accounts and IP addresses editing the article and commenting here. Roller26 (talk) 11:06, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

this article is in par with other faith article such as Hinduism, Christianity, Islam etc. Not sure why people wants it to be deleted. It is highly unfair. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8807:AC03:3B00:E11B:2931:994E:39A6 (talk) 14:36, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - zero evidence of notability and very clearly and obviously original research Spiderone 16:51, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.