Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Breed Entertainment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:19, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Breed Entertainment

Non-notable music label that fails all points of WP:MUSIC. The label has yet to release any albums, nor does it have any notable artists. No reliable sources provided, and it's doubtful that any exist. Speedy tag was deleted by author last month.

I'm also nominating the article for the label's forthcoming album...

Delete They have not produced anything, as far as I can tell - non notable.the_undertow ^talk 02:45, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as spam. "16 year old C.E.O." is kind of obvious, the article creator's name is a shortened version of the main subject of the article. I found this MySpace thing. Google results speak for themselves. QuagmireDog 06:28, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Shameless selfpromotion. /Blaxthos 15:19, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both Borderline Speedy Delete per A7. Pax:Vobiscum 16:15, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable Corpx 16:20, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it fails notability. Aquatics ^{Guard Alert} 23:13, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Frag obviously fails even basic notability requirements. David Fuchs^{(talk / frog blast the vent core!)} 01:10, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.