Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neo Yankees' Holiday

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:02, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neo Yankees' Holiday

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rate Your Music certainly is not a reliable source or independent review by a credible journalist. After a WP:BEFORE search, no in-depth coverage was found, failing WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 19:48, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:28, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Only found a single source, thus a GNG failure. 47.208.20.130 (talk) 01:46, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L3X1 (distænt write) 02:39, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:ALBUM. The band's article is also unsourced and likely does not meet WP:MUSIC. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 02:44, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:24, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:42, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.