Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nelapr Omebb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 23:09, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nelapr Omebb

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of these "entities" (or angels or what have you) are actually described in any detail in any of the cited sources. At best, they're given brief single-sentence descriptions of their functions, but that's not sufficient to maintain articles about. On top of that, the sources are hardly very reliable, being practical works intended to teach the use of Enochian magic, not secondary sources reflecting on the topic. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:23, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:22, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 20:31, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:35, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. From a brief investigation these are 3 of 16 "formulas" for elemental power. It's far too detailed for here, even as a redirect; some wiki on Enochian magic can discuss it. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:10, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 12:42, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The fact that these articles have existed for years without evolving past stubs argues for they being non-notable topics, I would have said redirect to Enochian magic, but they're not even mentioned there, so delete seems like a better option. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:24, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.