Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Burgess (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Cillit Bang#Advertising campaign. Black Kite (talk) 10:59, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neil Burgess (actor)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I doubt he is a notable actor per WP:NACTOR. Lack of sources. Only IMDB (which is not a RS) and a newspaper item on a fictional character he played. My searches in the internet shows a few more bits of his existance but do not yield to multiple independent reliable sources. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 09:59, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:09, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:09, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Cillit Bang#Advertising campaign, this actor does not have independent notability. --Cerebellum (talk) 01:28, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 06:32, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - insufficient WP:NACTOR notability.--Rpclod (talk) 13:51, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 July 20. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 04:52, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 23:28, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete/redirect: Not notable as stated above. MrScorch6200 (talk | ctrb) 06:43, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment to whomever will close this 16-day discussion. It is clear: We should redirect the title. So please proceed. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 07:18, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.