Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nagoya Civic Assembly Hall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. I see a consensus to Keep this article. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:03, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nagoya Civic Assembly Hall

Nagoya Civic Assembly Hall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails the general and building-specific notability policies. - UtherSRG (talk) 10:37, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Japan. UtherSRG (talk) 10:37, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

keep this is a good article Evangp (talk) 16:05, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Appears to have the status of Tangible Cultural Property (see the Japanese Wikipedia article), so meets WP:GEOFEAT. Failure of WP:BEFORE B7. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:12, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:44, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. UtherSRG (talk) 11:16, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Notable as a major concert venue and for being one of few buildings in the city of Nagoya to survive WWII bombing per this snippet [1] plus the cultural structure listing satisfies presumption of notability under GEOFEAT. Rupples (talk) 20:26, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - notable and historic per Necrothesp.

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 01:09, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.