Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nad's
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:34, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Nad's
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Nad's (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Company fails WP:NCORP and WP:NCOMPANY. Refs are routine news, product launches, growth reports, in violation of WP:SIRS, WP:ORGIND, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ROUTINE - BeFriendlyGoodSir (talk) 00:07, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies. - BeFriendlyGoodSir (talk) 00:10, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion and Australia. ~ A412 talk! 00:14, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March 17. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:31, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. This appears to be a local business (with multiple locations) rather than a notable company. It fails WP:NCORP. Knox490 (talk) 01:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Google news mainly comes up with product reviews. 1st hit is an interview. So lacking reliable sources to meet WP:CORP. LibStar (talk) 22:50, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.