Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NKR 15

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:30, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NKR 15

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatant Crystal balling now obvious. Not even any evidence of limited notability.

See WP:NFF Slatersteven (talk) 09:59, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom: WP:CRYSTAL or WP:TOOSOON ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 12:18, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree WP:TOOSOON, and further more who's to say that this even meets up with WP:N. Grapefruit17 (talk) 16:11, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above arguments and per WP:NFF: Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles, as budget issues, scripting issues and casting issues can interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 19:43, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.