Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NJPW New Years Golden Series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:44, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NJPW New Years Golden Series

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notable. A promotion held a tour, as many other promotions. Sources just cover results, WP:ROUTINE HHH Pedrigree (talk) 22:05, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Wrestling, and Japan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:25, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment — The first source refers to the tour as commemorating NJPW's 50th anniversary, so the claimed rationale of this being any old tour is bogus. For someone who doesn't follow the current NJPW product, I've read quite a bit about that anniversary. I also know that pro wrestling receives substantial legitimate media coverage in Japan. There's a certain clique of admins who constantly complain about the sources pushed by WP:PW. That stance doesn't have a whole lot of teeth when you have a million excuses for not bothering to exploit the type of sources you claim should be used on this project, or assisting others in that regard. I've already said too much about how useless WP:RSN is. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 03:03, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not saying this is an old tour. I said a lot of promotions held tours, like Ring of Honor or WWE. I'm pointing these events are barely covered by sources. Making a research, it's just WP:ROUTINE "[1]" --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 08:12, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:51, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Coverage is entirely routine. No independent analysis or discussion. BruceThomson (talk) 02:01, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:12, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.