Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mystery Box

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:51, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mystery Box

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested A7 speedy, article does partially read like an advert (needs cleanup) but sources are somewhat press-release ish/ leave the notability question up for debate. Tawker (talk) 21:34, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Certainly on the references provided there is no significant coverage of the company: the posters have attracted a bit of coverage in specialist sources but this would argue for the notability of the graphic designers rather than the agency. Company name does make searching difficult.TheLongTone (talk) 11:00, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Call me Hahc21 21:18, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG. This seems more like a corporate resume rather than an article about the company. No valid sources cited, and even the invalid ones are about pages for what seem to be the artists. Ultimately, we would need to see more widespread adoption and coverage of the company itself as well as non-press release in order to verify the article and approve any changes. Mystipedian (talk) 17:27, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.