Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muzaffar Khan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:09, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Muzaffar Khan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a very common name but I cannot find anything that suggests the person meets WP:GNG. My suspicion is WP:PROMO. Sitush (talk) 12:59, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:28, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:28, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:28, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:29, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No evidence of notability, just a competent person, we are to believe--Milowent • ^hasspoken 05:24, 25 August 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:39, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'm sure he's good at his job but we need significant coverage in multiple reliable sources for a subject to be notable. I can't see that the sources provided or the sources available get us there. St★lwart¹¹¹ 07:50, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't see WP:RS WP:Third party sources. Fails general notability. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 14:30, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.