Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Music Eyz Awards

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:21, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Music Eyz Awards

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Borderline A7/prod. I would argue that the (albeit unsourced) claim 'the UK's fastest growing independent music site' is an indication of significance. Laun chba ller 12:38, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Subject fails WP:GNG. I do not see even a single reliable source discussing the subject. All sources are either WP:Primary or unreliable blog links. "UK's fastest growing independent music site" is self-made claim with no sign of significance. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 12:51, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - a Google search comes up with no coverage in reliable sources; does not appear to meet WP:GNG. Gongshow talk 16:34, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. Vieque (talk • ctb) 21:39, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.