Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Farooq (journalist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:52, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Farooq (journalist)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This BLP appears to be overly promotional, with many of the cited sources merely mentioning the subject without providing substantial coverage. clearly, the subject fails to meet the WP:GNG. Disregard the unreliable references used in the BLP. Additionally, it's worth noting that much of the article was contributed by Shaistakausar.pk (talk · contribs) —Saqib (talk | contribs) 16:45, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 16:45, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Radio, and Television. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:52, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR. Clearly unencyclopedic and just for the promotion of the subject. samee converse 19:39, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.