Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moor (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 12:27, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Moor (film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As an upcoming minor film, the article is ~~completely unreferenced~~ poorly referenced, and doesn't meet WP:MOVIE and WP:CRYSTAL. Alex^{discussion ★} 16:39, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Movie is referenced now with Tribune Pakistan article, have a look. I Am ready to add every possible official external link .UBS (talk) 16:59, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:01, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:01, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's well referenced now and meets WP Movie criteria.UBS (talk) 11:44, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Still needs more sources - there are only 2 and both are from the Tribune. Coverage in multiple sources is required, and a newspaper only counts as a single source even if there is more than one story. If there are similar articles in other newspapers, that would suffice. --Colapeninsula (talk) 12:25, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recently added film budget with reference.UBS (talk) 12:36, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References are not just 2, and the number of references doesn't matter as movie is to be released far in 2014 so the sources are less BUT it's been proved that movie will release in 2014.UBS (talk) 14:23, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please close this discussion if you do not have doubt left. UBS (talk) 15:50, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There are multiple reliable sources that discuss this movie making it a notable subject per WP:MOVIE, and thus WP:CRYSTAL is moot. -- SMS ^Talk 16:56, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In its current state the article does now seem to meet WP:NOTFILM. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:19, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.