Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohamed Zairi Bibliography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:05, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mohamed Zairi Bibliography

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Extensive unsourced list of largely non-notable publications. Whilst I have no objection to including a list of Prof. Zairi's notable works in the article on him, this stand-alone list is unsuitable per WP:Source list. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:06, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Mohamed Zairi. There may be justification to prune this list, but when Zairi's main article is so short, there's no need for a separate bibliography. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:24, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. I placed it on a separate article on suggestion in Editor Assistance discussion here, mostly as a temporary solution while cleaning up the article. But I do agree that it looks really ugly and is not in line with policy. Off-topic: Is Mohamed Zairi really notable enough to have his own article? There are almost no reliable sources on him. Amlaera (talk) 14:03, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bibliographies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:46, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: content is already part of the source article history, so there's nothing to merge. Also, there's no attribution back to Mohamed Zairi. If there's a redirect, it should be after deletion to avoid the attribution chain problem. But I don't think there should be a redirect. While none of the WP:RFD#DELETE criteria plainly apply, it's clear that none of the WP:RFD#KEEP criteria apply either... and really, this title isn't a useful alternative search term for Mohamed Zairi (since the title already contains "Mohamed Zairi"), and there's just no logic to keeping a redirect. If Amlaera wanted the material handier than looking at the article history would have made it, then Amlaera should have copied and pasted it to Talk:Mohamed Zairi. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 19:15, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If the other article is short enough to hold all of this, then it should do so. Is there any proof that the guy is notable at all though? I'm not seeing that in his article right now. Multiple editors have reverted one single purpose account who keeps trying to add things there. Dream Focus 00:47, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have proposed Mohamed Zairi's article for deletion. Can't see any evidence of notability.Amlaera (talk) 12:49, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Ridiculous list of publications. We do this kind of lists for people like Darwin or Einstein, which Zairi obviously is not. If the bio is kept, the three most notable publications can be listed, but we don't need this partial CV to do that. --Randykitty (talk) 11:46, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._James_Harrington@ What about this page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.41.103.127 (talk) 23:20, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What about it? Yunshui 雲‍水 07:25, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And: WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS. --Randykitty (talk) 07:28, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.