Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minecraft Server

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 02:52, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Minecraft Server

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's a slew of Minecraft articles that have been nominated in the past. This just does not seem encyclopedic AT ALL. ~ Preceding post created by larsona ^//Talk// 05:01, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - No objection to deletion at all. Doesn't even pass GNG. 198.108.244.195 (talk) 13:03, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not encyclopedic. Minecraft clearly suffices on its own. GabeIglesia (talk) 19:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete - This is Wikipedia, which is an encyclopedia, not the place to give information about just everything. This just fits better on the main Minecraft article. Consider the Minecraft Wiki for this instead (which in fact is the first wiki I ever contributed to). --TL22 (talk) 01:43, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I think the article should've been WP:PRODded since anybody would say it's not encyclopedic or notable. --TL22 (talk) 00:21, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.