Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miliefsky

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This nomination seems to have been incomplete, but the article was speedy-deleted on December 5 by Khukri (talk · contribs) as a repost of previously deleted material per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Miliefsky. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:01, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Miliefsky

Here's a fun one. Submitted for your approval: the re-creation of a WP:SALT'd page, the result of a unanimous WP:SNOW prior delete AfD, a WP:BLP, again created per WP:AUTO by its own subject, discussing subject's company despite WP:COI, which subject threatened WP:LEGAL action against anyone who edited subject's page after I re-posted an AfD he had blanked.

I have two objections to this page.

The subject isn't notable: I have more press than he does, and I most definitely don't merit inclusion. Subject makes fantastic claims, such as being "known to be a founding member of the US Department of Homeland Security", by nature of possessing a handsome PDF of a certificate to that effect, which certificate is acknowledged nowhere at DHS or in the press, but apparently [www.freerepublic.com/~6869tonkingulfyachtc/ was distributed] to everyone affiliated with the US Coast Guard. Or of being an advisor to the White House on security, despite lack of any reliable source attesting to that. If this subject is really notable, let someone besides him decide to write an article about him.
On procedural grounds, after re-creating a salted article that lost a landslide AfD, and recreating that article with less content than it had before, the venue for this discussion is WP:DRV, not a game of whack-a-mole over pages with shifting, protection-evading titles. --- tqbf 05:24, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.