Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Yebba

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Arguments for Delete are based on policy. Quoting NEXIST is not a substitute for finding sources. Owen× ☎ 23:40, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Yebba

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is some coverage, but I am not convinced he meets WP:GNG or WP:ENT. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now get it resolved. Boleyn (talk) 17:54, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Massachusetts. Owen× ☎ 19:28, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:21, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:55, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails notability guidelines for actors. There are some minor mentions in a couple of news articles but they do not convince me of sufficient notability. Sgubaldo (talk) 21:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passes the GNG even with what is in the article. And, importantly, per the golden WP:NEXIST rule: Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article. AFDISNOTCLEANUP applies. gidonb (talk) 03:28, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: BLP, Fails GNG and NBIO. Sources in article and BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs require strong sourcing. Ping me if WP:THREE sources are posted. // Timothy :: talk 20:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.