Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Messame dassy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep - withdrawn by nominator. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 15:35, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Messame dassy

Messame dassy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per this [[1]] doesn't appear to be significant coverage to warrant a standalone article. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 01:36, 15 March 2010 (UTC) Withdrawn per request. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 02:49, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep- You know, not everything is news...you could try doing a regular google search...
  • University of North Texas, states on p21 for Stalin: "Messame Dassy supporters of Georgian independence from Russia."

Some other links that mention Messame Dassy are

• • http://www.bestlibrary.org/files/pre-war-ussr-1-1.ppt
  • Communist Party of Britain(probably not very reliable)Smallman12q (talk) 21:28, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I found the corresponding page on the Russian wikipedia, which has a link to an online encyclopedia (hosted by Yandex that duplicates the "Big Russian Encyclopedia" (from the 1970s). My Russian isn't great so I didn't add much but it's clear that there are lots of sources in Russian, at least. In Britannica it's spelled Mesame Dasi ([2]), so I would suggest it probably be moved there unless someone can find a good counterargument (I've redirected that page here). Rigadoun (talk) 04:06, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • That name also has more google-hits, ones that seem more reliable, and was the spelling already used in two articles on Wikipedia, so I went ahead and moved it. Rigadoun (talk) 04:16, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep *wipes dust off of self from construction work* There you go. One finely tuned, referenced, notable article. Have a nice day. Silverseren^C 02:44, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.