Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Menthogen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:53, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Menthogen

Menthogen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article. Created by a user with almost no edits outside the article, and who uploaded an image stating that they own copyright to the same image on the company's website, suggesting possible undisclosed COI. Citation 1 is primary, 2,4,5,6 are broken, and 3 is irrelevant. DDG news turns up no results, and DDG search is filled with Amazon and other storefronts only. Darcyisverycute (talk) 14:58, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Medicine. Darcyisverycute (talk) 14:58, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all sources are either not independent of the subject, or are about subjects other than Menthogen. Nothing else found. This is a better-than-average attempt to make a promotional article appear well-sourced and neutral, but it still fails. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:30, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. I would treat this as a commercial product line needing to meet WP:NCORP, which it does not. BD2412 T 14:13, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.