Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meiling Melançon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 15:59, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Meiling Melançon

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

the article is poorly sourced and no additional sources of note can be found. Additionally, the person is not notable or remarkable in any way. She is little more than an extra in two films Coffee312 (talk) 00:41, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:29, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:30, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:30, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:32, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:33, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:33, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:34, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:34, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Long list of IMDb roles. Some of the films are notable and have their own articles. Does not appear to fail WP:NACTOR, although it the notability guidelines are not very specific and open to interpretation. — Stevey7788 (talk) 01:30, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 07:21, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:36, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Passes WP:DIRECTOR and WP:NACTOR. --Hiwilms (talk) 09:06, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Definitely meets WP:NACTOR #1 "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows" etc. I don't understand the nomination - the article lists far more than just two films, and she has a lead role in several blue-linked films. Given that she is notable according to a WP:SNG, more sources aren't needed to establish notability, but could almost certainly be found to verify her roles. RebeccaGreen (talk) 12:42, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.