Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MediaNama

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:44, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MediaNama

MediaNama (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH Lacks in indepth third party references only briefly mention the company Nervegolgi (talk) 06:25, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:57, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:57, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:41, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:41, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge into Nikhil Pahwa.—Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 13:20, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No indications of notability, references fail the criteria for establishing notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP -- HighKing⁺⁺ 17:04, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - a nn web publication; significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:03, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.