Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Woolf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Not an actor so little weight given to the NACTOR !vote but sufficient consensus otherwise for deletion. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:20, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Woolf

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot see how this particular person passes WP:NBIO. jps (talk) 20:03, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. jps (talk) 20:03, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. jps (talk) 20:03, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:NACTOR. Celestina007 (talk) 21:15, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:19, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

he's not an actor, Atlantic306 (talk) 02:39, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He works in film, but coverage in media is paltry.NotButtigieg (talk) 15:03, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - sourcing is terrible, and since producers and other such behind-the-scenes film staff are run of the mill, I don't see how he would be notable, lacking a major award such as BAFTA or an Oscar. Bearian (talk) 18:08, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.