Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Frost

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 18:09, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Frost

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Effectively unsourced BLP with severe doubt about notability The Banner talk 12:21, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 15:01, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Calambert2014 (talk)) Someone just added some refs to prove that these information are correct. I can promise you that all these information are reliable and correct. If you want a proof of what has been written, please click on this link. http://www.bitlanders.com/MatthewFrost There is an other bio in that article. Please don't delete this page, I worked a lot to create it. thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calambert2014 (talk • contribs) 17:22, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete there were a lot of links added, but none are reliably published sources which is the requirement for having a stand alone article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:08, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- option 2 would be to rename and refocus to: Aspirational (short film). it looks like it is getting some buzz in the some important culture sources like Ad Age and AV Club. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:14, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 14:16, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.