Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marvel: Avengers Alliance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as per unanimous positive consensus and the absence of deletion requests outside of the nominator. A non-admin closure. And Adoil Descended (talk) 00:52, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Marvel: Avengers Alliance

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Entirely unsourced, no meaningful out of game content and has persistent fans repeatedly restoring masses of gameguide info Jac16888 ^Talk 14:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 17:05, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:05, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per WP:BEFORE and the fact that AfD isn't cleanup. Plenty of coverage at Kotaku [1], [2], Joystiq, GameZebo, Gamasutra, etc. Found via the reliable sources search. --Teancum (talk) 19:19, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per Teancum's sources. I've seen additional sources in passing in the past too. It gets enough coverage to pass the WP:GNG. Sergecross73 msg me 20:06, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - There are plenty of sources that are covering Marvel: Avengers Alliance so don't be so lazy and source them, instead of resorting to the easy option of nominating this page for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.160.176.186 (talk) 04:36, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - it's good as it currently is. Anyone adding game guides to it can be easily reverted. Mckrongs (talk) 15:52, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Let this page stay. It's a good game and it's good as it is. Yet it's missions should remain as well. Rtkat3 (talk 8:30, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.