Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Markerstudy Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:51, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Markerstudy Group

Markerstudy Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This may be a large company, but notability proves elsuive. The refs that are here are either dead-links or passing mentions and nothing that establishes notability. Searches also yield very little. It seems to be a company that likes to keep quiet about itself, but that doesn't help at Wikipedia. A recent COI editor removing sources material is also a concern.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   08:34, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Good Morning, thank you for your comments. We are keen to resolve this issue and understand there are guidelines in place. I work for Markerstudy and have been tasked with updating the Wiki page to provide an up to date profile of the business. I am keen to resolve the issue as quickly as possible. Please can you advise the best way to proceed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarkerstudyUK (talk • contribs) 09:04, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:49, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:49, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete by all means and I honestly consider this G11 entirely. SwisterTwister talk 21:40, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:08, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete What are the rules on CSDing something at AFD? Because I would delete this in a second under G11 - David Gerard (talk) 00:13, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment -- I'm not sure about this one. It's a £2.5bln company, which own Zenith Insurance Company for example. But I'm coming up short on sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete on second thoughts, as my searches do not bring up anything convincing to pass CORPDEPTH and GNG. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:41, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.