Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marion Baumann-Parkhurst

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:28, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Marion Baumann-Parkhurst

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy deletion denied due to claim of published autobiography, which would connote notability. However, autobiography is self-published through Genie Press, which does not exert editorial discretion. Anyone, notable or not, can publish an autobiography at Genie Press. Google search turns up a few other sources, but all are based on the same self-published autobiography so there aren't any reliable third-party sources discussing this individual. I think this person simply doesn't meet notability requirements. NellieBly (talk) 02:47, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Actually, I consider this probably a valid A7, for in my view the assertion of a self published or vanity press book with no further information not to be a reasonable indication of possible importance. DGG ( talk ) 06:14, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - a self-published autobiography doesn't establish notability and there are no other sources writing about this person. -- Whpq (talk) 18:23, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.