Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margaret Colona

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP - nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure) Whpq (talk) 16:13, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Margaret Colona

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Might be wrong but I don't see anything notable about her besides the time she was born...~~ SKATER ^Speak. 23:29, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

After the evidence found I see now that I was wrong and retract the nomination.--SKATER ^Speak. 20:23, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~. I can't find much more detail about this individual online—appears to be a dead-end cultus confirmation. (That process is not useful for demonstrating notability, given that it's for the express purpose of veneration.) TheFeds 21:09, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Per Anupam & David Eppstein, more information found using the other form of her name ("Colonna"). That coverage still isn't fantastic, but given that she was born in 1284, it certainly rises beyond trivial. Changing to keep. I suppose the page should be moved, if "Margaret Colonna" is the preferred spelling. TheFeds 19:53, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep per WP:V: the individual has her own article at the Catholic Encyclopædia and is mentioned in several pieces of literature at Google Books. I should note that upon evaluating this case, I discovered that another common spelling of her name is Blessed Margaret Colonna. With regards, Anupam^Talk 07:50, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Searching Google books for "Margaret Colonna" finds many with nontrivial coverage of her. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:50, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.