Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manithara Sree Panorkavu Bhagavathy Temple

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 22:06, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Manithara Sree Panorkavu Bhagavathy Temple

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article on a Hindu temple, unsourced and tagged as such since its creation in 2014. No references found in English to satisfy WP:GNG--perhaps sources can be found in Malayalam. --Finngall ^talk 03:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 07:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 07:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 07:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:54, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and I note this has been G12 tagged, there's nothing else particularly convincing aside from that these are presumably known locally but not quite easy to translate and improve for an Internet English website. SwisterTwister talk 17:51, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I've declined the G12 tag - the link given is one of the many Wikipedia mirrors on the internet, although it doesn't give any sort of attribution. This is not a copyvio of that source. Hut 8.5 21:55, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No source or claim of notability provided. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:40, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.