Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MBO Partners

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:21, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MBO Partners

MBO Partners (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article on a company, with acknowledged connected contributors and previous discussion about whether it should be brought to AfD. Research published by the company have been quoted in various articles about the "gig economy": Washington Post 2011, St Joseph News-Press 2014  – via HighBeam (subscription required) as well as the references provided in the article, but I don't think these meet the WP:CORPDEPTH substantial coverage requirement to demonstrate this to be more than a company going about its business. AllyD (talk) 08:10, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:12, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:12, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Zero indications of notability. Wikipedia is not a Yellow Pages or a platform for promotion. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 15:07, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; corporate 'cruft and barely a directory listing. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:48, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.