Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lord Vaikundar Avatar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ayya Vaikundar. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith! Missvain (talk) 16:23, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lord Vaikundar Avatar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Out-of-process AfC move out of draftspace. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 16:07, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 16:07, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 16:07, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I dream of horses I am not sure that being out of process via AFC is a good reason to delete/even have an afd but I do think that this is a bunch of unencyclopedic nonsense and should just be redirected to Ayya Vaikundar where it's already more than adequately covered. So speedy redirect. Praxidicae (talk) 16:23, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Praxidicae. No need for another incarnation of an article on the same person. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:18, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Praxidicae, and as WP:Redirects are cheap - Arjayay (talk) 13:25, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.