Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LiveMedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:37, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LiveMedia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Fails WP:ORG. Just another company going about doing regular business. Nothing notable about the company. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 08:19, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and I frankly would consider this G11 simply because it's so focused with PR and advertising information; the entire article from beginning to end focuses with the company's expected activities such as seeking and establishing capital and funding; there has been large consensus at AfD that none of that, regardless of where it comes from or what it is, establishes any forms of substance or information as an acceptable article. There has also been consensus that Indian media is notorious for having a "pay for news" operation, therefore news cannot always be confided as being independent and authored by the news source itself. SwisterTwister talk 00:35, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- no claim of notability and is obviously WP:PROMO for the company. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:01, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: non-notable company. it simply fails WP:NCORP. Anup [Talk] 03:35, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.