Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of video game remakes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 15:52, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of video game remakes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A list with 90% wrong. Games don't "remake", and similar at the categorie:video game remakes who contains full error LatinoSeuropa (talk) 19:39, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 May 26. Snotbot t • c » 20:07, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep - Factual inaccuracy, as the nominator claims this article has, is not grounds for deletion. Just fix it! :) Salvidrim! 01:52, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - AFD is not cleanup. Either fix the list or the inclusion criteria. Sergecross73 msg me 02:21, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Close/Keep - WP:SOFIXIT applies here. We don't send articles that need cleanup to AfD. Recommending speedy close based on no real deletion rationale. --Teancum (talk) 02:29, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The topic itself is notable and AfD is not for cleanup. Lugnuts (talk) 08:22, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep As argued by others above, the topic is sufficiently notable (but the lead should be expanded to describe this more), and if there's wording issues, that can be fixed. But there's nothing here not to delete. --MASEM (t) 15:16, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.