Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the mothers of the Safavid Shahs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WITHDRAWN by nominator.[1] postdlf (talk) 22:26, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of the mothers of the Safavid Shahs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A list of the mothers of rulers who dont appear to be noteable in their own right. As per WP:NOTINHERITED these dont appear to fall under WP:NOTE in there own right (one exception noticed but a list of one would be a strange list to keep) Amortias (T)(C) 21:46, 10 May 2014 (UTC) Amortias (T)(C) 21:46, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn author intends to develop article so happy to let it stay — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amortias (talk • contribs) 22:32, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. My intention is to further widen the article's significance, by creating separate pages for the women. Quite a few of them played significant roles actually, like all queen-mothers did in the various West Asian empires/harems. Therefore, I want to keep the article. LouisAragon (talk) 20:49, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thats reasonable might be best to put an under construction tag on the page so people are aware of your intentions - details can be found here Template:Under_construction. Amortias (T)(C) 21:08, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.