Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of smartphones supporting GLONASS navigation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:40, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of smartphones supporting GLONASS navigation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While this list has a pretty clear inclusion criteria, it isn't a discerning feature of the phones involved. Many of the products listed aren't referenced here, and aren't notable enough to merit their own articles. Mikeblas (talk) 16:36, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:58, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:58, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as the nom doesn't make a compelling argument for deletion. Jclemens (talk) 04:54, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:14, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:02, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- too many red-linked articles and no clear purpose for the list. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:32, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Sam Sailor ^Talk! 22:56, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Seems to be directory. Thoughtmonkey (talk) 22:58, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete List doesn't seem to make sense to be included in the encyclopedia. -- Dane2007 ^talk 22:28, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.