Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of shopping malls in Zamboanga City

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to List of shopping malls in the Philippines#Zamboanga Peninsula. Sandstein 12:26, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of shopping malls in Zamboanga City

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Content fork from List of shopping malls in the Philippines. Only three list entries have articles and only of one of those appears to be really notable. No sources verifying the remaining entries and summaries. As a general observation, lists of shopping malls specific to cities isn't the norm on Wikipedia Ajf773 (talk) 19:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 19:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 19:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 19:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of shopping malls in the Philippines#Zamboanga Peninsula, where the notable entries are already included, per policy at WP:ATD. I don't see that any attempt to achieve this through editing or discussion has even been attempted. @Ajf773: Please don't waste AFD process in the future for such cases. postdlf (talk) 12:54, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see how this is a waste of an AfD process. Is there a finite number of AfD's that can be created per day, or something? Ajf773 (talk) 19:49, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Ajf773: I think Postdlf might have meant it would be better to propose a merge on the article pages, for example, rather than taking the issue straight to AFD. Triptothecottage (talk) 09:37, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    - Or to just do it. Taking it to AFD means wasting time discussing in this more formal and potentially confrontational setting something that probably wouldn't have been controversial, and someone has to take the time to close it. postdlf (talk) 13:40, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades^Godric 03:44, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:10, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect There's no reason for this to constitute a separate article. Per WP:ATD it's quite acceptable though within the main list. Triptothecottage (talk) 09:37, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It would be fine as a section within Zamboanga City, but not as an article on its own. South Nashua (talk) 17:17, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Then that's actually a !vote for merging this content there, isn't it? Another proposal to redirect to another article was also mentioned above, which you did not comment upon. postdlf (talk) 17:51, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.