Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of professional snowboarders

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 12:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of professional snowboarders

List of professional snowboarders (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced list of 3 people. List itself is not particularly notable per WP:NLIST. v/r - TP 13:50, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Your arguments were rejected at the prior AFD for this list. Whether or not it is unsourced at present is irrelevant; obviously whether someone notable is or isn't a professional snowboarder is verifiable, which is what is relevant. WP:NLIST says that in such lists, only those with verifiable notability should be included, so I don't understand the nom's complaint here as that's easily achieved. So why shouldn't this be expanded to be a complete list complementary to the Category:Snowboarders structure per WP:CLN, one that can provide further information beyond an alphabetic list of names, and can group together those that are split up into nationality subcategories? Though I'm surprised to see how long this has been up with no expansion. postdlf (talk) 18:49, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is a keep, in case there's any doubt. postdlf (talk) 14:19, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - No reason given for deletion. Lists don't have to be complete to be useful. I've added a couple more names and expanded it a bit, but there was no reason for deletion to begin with. The people added to the list all pass WP:NLIST.--Stvfetterly (talk) 20:23, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 13:53, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Plenty of scope for expansion. No valid reason for deletion.--Michig (talk) 18:00, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Notable topic/list that has been expanded since AfD nomination. Lugnuts (talk) 19:14, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Pretty clearly an encyclopedic list: a useful source of in-links, sourced, logical in construction. Is it completable? Maybe not, but that doesn't offset the page's potential utility. Carrite (talk) 21:40, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Per the above. Snow in the forecast?--Epeefleche (talk) 05:01, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.