Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of highest paid Bengal actors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as G5: Created by a banned or blocked user (Adil m104) in violation of ban or block. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:19, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of highest paid Bengal actors

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable and unsourced listing. Krimuk|90 (talk) 01:32, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Has absolutely no place in an encyclopedia, the salaries are pure guesswork anyway I'd imagine.♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:06, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't think this kind of list is never notable, if properly sourced - there are similar, sourced, lists for American TV actors, for instance. The key word being sourced. This list isn't; there are assertions of sources but I have not been able to find the information on the websites indicated. I also suspect that the creator might be a sock of a blocked user, and the article created in order to promote one of the actors in the list, but that's just a suspicion. --bonadea contributions talk 10:59, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment As it turned out, the creator was a sockpuppet (SPI) so I've tagged the article for speedy deletion. --bonadea contributions talk 21:25, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.