Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of current Strikeforce fighters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 08:59, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of current Strikeforce fighters

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Let's face it, there are no more current Strikeforce fighters. Most of them have gone to the UFC now or have been released, so this page doesnt really serve a purpose on wikipedia anymore. Let's get rid of it people. Can this be speedy deleted infact? GladiusHellfire (talk) 05:26, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. LlamaAl (talk) 16:24, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. LlamaAl (talk) 16:24, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete Strikeforce is now defunct so the article should be blank since there are no current fighters. I'd say this falls under WP:NOTSTATSBOOK. It also appears to be original research and selectively inclusive, unless you believe Strikeforce only had 1 heavyweight and 1 light heavyweight. Papaursa (talk) 19:58, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete Per nom. IronKnuckle (talk) 23:16, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete Strikeforce is defunct. The main Strikeforce page should certainly be kept as an archive of a major promotion, and any relevant content here can be moved to a "Notable fighters" section on the main Strikeforce page. Bdure (talk) 03:45, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom. --Noleander (talk) 18:29, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Strongest possible delete - Per all above. --LlamaAl (talk) 02:01, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:03, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Strikeforce Promotion may no longer exist, but in some way, the article history should be kept alive through a redirect at the very least. Deletion should not be argued here since it's likely those interested in Strikeforce might come to this page via search engine, and going defunct shouldn't be an excuse to clear the decks of everything involving the promotion. Nate • (chatter) 03:59, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom. I don't think a redirect is necessary, if people are interested in Strikeforce, they'll just go to the main Strikeforce page. CaSJer (talk) 16:03, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.