Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cults

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Close as the creator of this AFD has acknowledged this is about a redirect, not an article so should be discussed at WP:RFD. Davewild (talk) 19:19, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 June 27. --Justallofthem (talk) 19:36, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of cults

List of cults (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Inappropriate and contentious re-creation of a deleted redirect. Wikipedia does not have a "list of cults", that was just settled at AfD for "List of groups referred to as cults" and this was deleted as a direct result of that AfD. I prodded the redirect and ask the creating editor to speedy it which he did but both removed by a third editor hence this AfD. Justallofthem (talk) 18:52, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete via G4 (Recreated page) --Numyht (talk) 19:00, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Close This is about a redirect not an article so should surely be discussed at WP:RFD not AFD. Davewild (talk) 19:02, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes, my bad. If an admin wants to close this then I will reopen it there. --Justallofthem (talk) 19:08, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete, G4, no discussion necessary. Mandsford (talk) 19:04, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete This article goes against the nature of wikipedia! Wikipedia is suppose to be neutral, and this article has a strong bias against other religions. Also, a page that pretty much was the same as this one was deleted in the past, so this one should be as well.--SJP (talk) 19:05, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete I recreated this redirect article earlier today to provide easier access to another, non-contentious list, the List of groups referred to as cults in government documents. However, having thought about it, a List of cults entry is not the best way to achieve that. I have entered a link to List of groups referred to as cults in government documents in the article cult, which should make it easy enough for the reader to find it. I don't think we need the redirect that I created then. Jayen466 19:09, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The is not a G4 issue. The AfD did not address the issue of this. A review of the AfD shows that most of the objections dealt with specific isues on the list, such as the exact title "...referred to as...", or the criteria. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 19:16, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.