Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of counsel appearing in Canadian appeals to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 06:06, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of counsel appearing in Canadian appeals to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council

List of counsel appearing in Canadian appeals to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable list. Fairly arbitrary selection of lawyers appearing in a court (and one that does not as I understand it have jurisdiction in Canada any more). Can't see any coverage of lists of Canadian counsel appearing in JCPC as a particular grouping otherwise than on wikipedia. Has been tagged for fixing for a few years with no improvement. Harris (talk) 13:12, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 13:14, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 13:15, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:04, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:05, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. This belongs with the one-eyed Montanan horse thieves. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:01, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.